The suicide bomber detonating his homemade pyrotechnics and the jet jockey raining death and destruction from the wild blue yonder--both killers, each killing for his own noble purpose with the most lethal means at his disposal.
What is the moral distinction between a few insurgents shooting a family of civilians and an aggressor nation strategically bombing entire cities?
Who has killed more "innocent Iraqis"--the jihadists or the United States military? I don't know the answer, but I think the question is legitimate.
Whether dispatched by a crude improvised device or by sophisticated state-of-the-"art" munitions--whether labeled "murder victims" or "collateral damage"--all are just as dead!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment